[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS



On 04/17/2014 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:57AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
+#if !defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)&&  !defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
+#error "Missing either LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN definition."
+#endif
This seems entirely superfluous, I don't think a kernel build will go
anywhere if either is missing.

Yes, I am on the conservative side when I add that. I can certainly take it out if you think that is not needed.

-Longman

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.