[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS
On 04/17/2014 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:57AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:+#if !defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)&& !defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) +#error "Missing either LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN definition." +#endifThis seems entirely superfluous, I don't think a kernel build will go anywhere if either is missing. Yes, I am on the conservative side when I add that. I can certainly take it out if you think that is not needed. -Longman _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |