[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS
- To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:50:02 +0200
- Cc: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@xxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@xxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:50:22 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:57AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> +#if !defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) && !defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
> +#error "Missing either LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN definition."
> +#endif
This seems entirely superfluous, I don't think a kernel build will go
anywhere if either is missing.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
