Re: [Xen-devel] MPIDR register usage in ARMv8

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/04/14 06:53, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> Hi Ian,
Hi Vijaya,
> I understand that arm64/head.S is using MPIDR definitions
> from xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h which is valid for arm32 but
> not for ARMv8 as below
>
> /* MPIDR Multiprocessor Affinity Register */
> #define _MPIDR_UP           (30)
> #define MPIDR_UP            (_AC(1,U) << _MPIDR_UP)
> #define _MPIDR_SMP          (31)
> #define MPIDR_SMP           (_AC(1,U) << _MPIDR_SMP)
> #define MPIDR_AFF0_SHIFT    (0)
> #define MPIDR_AFF0_MASK     (_AC(0xff,U) << MPIDR_AFF0_SHIFT)
> #define MPIDR_HWID_MASK     _AC(0xffffff,U)
> #define MPIDR_INVALID       (~MPIDR_HWID_MASK)
>
> The same is used in arm64/head.S checking for bit 31 (_MPIDR_SMP) which is not
> valid in MPIDR_EL1 register definition also MPIDR_HWID_MASK should
> be updated for ARMv8
Bit 31 is RAO on ARM64. So the check is useless below.

Except the MPIDR_HWID_MASK I don't see any problem as the only 
difference between ARMv8 and ARMv7 is adding a new affinity field (AFF3).
> arm64/head.s:
>
>          mrs   x0, mpidr_el1
>          tbz   x0, _MPIDR_SMP, 1f     /* Multiprocessor extension not
> supported? */
>          tbnz  x0, _MPIDR_UP, 1f      /* Uniprocessor system? */
>
>          mov   x13, #(~MPIDR_HWID_MASK)
>          bic   x24, x0, x13           /* Mask out flags to get CPU ID */
> 1:
>
> Do you agree that this requires change?
What are the changes? You only copied the existing code?

Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel