[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] qemu-upstream stubdom - status?
Justin Cormack writes ("Re: qemu-upstream stubdom - status?"): > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The big one there is pthreads but I don't think we actually need that > > for qemu-dm, provided we have aio, which it looks like we do ? > > The aio syscalls are not in the rump kernel at present. They could > easily be added but not sure that signal notification will work in > rump, although polling should. Unfortunately NetBSD does not have > kqueue aio support yet, which would be ideal. Hmm. I was going to say that qemu doesn't want signal notification. But actually it is doing something with threads. I think this can probably be fixed in qemu. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |