[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] qemu-upstream stubdom - status?
On 08/04/14 10:49, Ian Jackson wrote: Eric Shelton writes ("qemu-upstream stubdom - status?"):Where does this feature stand currently? It pops up under a couple of names and proposed implementations (e.g., "qemu-xen stubdomains", "qemu-upstream stubdom, Linux", and "qemu-upstream stubdom, BSD libc"), so it seems likely I missed something.Hi. I made a start on bsd libc + minios last release cycle but I think this has now been overtaken by the rump kernels work by Antti Kantee. See https://github.com/rumpkernel/wiki/wiki etc.It remains appealing to make use of the more recent developments in qemu-upstream, but with the isolation provided by a stubdomain. The many improvements made in teasing driver domains out of dom0 strengthen this appeal (for example, using OpenSolaris as a ZFS-based storage domain).Yes.What are the most recent patches or repository for this feature?I've just started looking at the rump kernels with a view to (eventually) trying to get qemu-upstream working but I don't have anything I can show you yet. Last time we discussed this (ca. FOSDEM-time), I put up a page to list the issues with the hopes of a TODO-list making it easy to just tick items off quickly. Wishful thinking. I probably also forgot to send the URL to you. Anyway, I updated the content now, here's the URL: http://wiki.rumpkernel.org/Info:-Remaining-issues-for-%22OS-less%22-rump-kernelsI think Justin Cormack (also cc'd) has something yet unpublished for the build issue with some form of "compiler triplet". _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |