[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] tools: implement initial ramdisk support for ARM.
On 04/04/2014 04:20 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 16:16 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >>> @@ -326,7 +364,6 @@ int xc_dom_feature_translated(struct xc_dom_image *dom) >>> * mode: C >>> * c-file-style: "BSD" >>> * c-basic-offset: 4 >>> - * tab-width: 4 >> >> Does it mean that nearly every emacs magic are wrong on the other files? > > I thought there weren't many others, but looking again I'm wrong. I > think I may have been thinking of "indent-tabs-mode: nil". > > I think my emacs must have been playing up when I first edited this file > and I confused myself into thinking this change had fixed it. > >>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c >>> index 36e70b5..c3fa439 100644 >>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c >>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c >>> @@ -407,8 +407,8 @@ int libxl__build_pv(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid, >>> LOGE(ERROR, "xc_dom_parse_image failed"); >>> goto out; >>> } >>> - if ( (ret = libxl__arch_domain_configure(gc, info, dom)) != 0 ) { >>> - LOGE(ERROR, "libxl__arch_domain_configure failed"); >>> + if ( (ret = libxl__arch_domain_init_hw_description(gc, info, dom)) != >>> 0 ) { >> >> Should not it be ((..))? It seems the function is using 2 different >> coding style. > > Looks like some Xen list braces have slipped in here. Probably best for > this new addition to be consistent with the surroundings though. Ok. I forgot to give my ack on this patch (with the emacs fix) Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |