[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] xen/console: Provide timestamps as an offset since boot
On 07/03/14 09:47, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 06.03.14 at 20:28, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown >> +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown >> @@ -275,11 +275,20 @@ cleared. This allows a single port to be shared by >> two >> subsystems >> makes sense on its own. >> >> ### console\_timestamps >> -> `= <boolean>` >> +> `= none | date | boot` >> >> -> Default: `false` >> +> Default: `boot` > I'd prefer the default to remain "no time stamps". They're useful > occasionally but not generally, and they consume serial console > bandwidth. I would disgree with usefulness, but can see your point - I shall revert the default back to none. > >> +static void __init parse_console_timestamps(char *s) >> +{ >> + if ( *s == '\0' || /* Compat for old booleanparam() */ >> + !strcmp(s, "date") ) >> + opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_DATE; >> + else if ( !strcmp(s, "boot") ) >> + opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_BOOT; >> + else if ( !strcmp(s, "none") ) >> + opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_NONE; >> + else >> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unrecognised timestamp mode '%s'\n", s); > Printing from command line parsing routines is IIRC rather pointless > (i.e. ISTR it goes no-where), and in the majority of other cases I > think we don't warn about improper arguments of options. With > the command line being logged as a whole, there's also not much > point since the incorrect value can be easily determined by looking > there. > > Jan > It appears at the top of xl dmesg, but not on the serial console. I shall drop it. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |