[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] pvh: Fix regression caused by assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend device.

>>> On 05.02.14 at 15:35, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 04:42 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> I have two patches - one the simpler one that is pretty straightfoward
>> and the one you suggested. Either one fixes PVH guests. I also did
>> bootup tests with HVM guests to make sure they worked.
>> Attached and inline.
> But they do different things -- one does "ioreq && ioreq->state..." and 
> the other does "!ioreq || ioreq->state...".  The first one is incorrect, 

Not outright incorrect perhaps, but sub-optimal. That was the subject
of the discussion so far, and we're mainly waiting for the two copied
VMX guys to confirm that the second patch is correct.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.