[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] pvh: Fix regression caused by assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend device.
>>> On 05.02.14 at 15:35, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 04:42 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> I have two patches - one the simpler one that is pretty straightfoward
>> and the one you suggested. Either one fixes PVH guests. I also did
>> bootup tests with HVM guests to make sure they worked.
>>
>> Attached and inline.
>
> But they do different things -- one does "ioreq && ioreq->state..." and
> the other does "!ioreq || ioreq->state...". The first one is incorrect,
> AFAICT.
Not outright incorrect perhaps, but sub-optimal. That was the subject
of the discussion so far, and we're mainly waiting for the two copied
VMX guys to confirm that the second patch is correct.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
