Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] libxl: async version of domain suspend

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Shriram Rajagopalan writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] libxl: async 
version of domain suspend"):
> True. If that is the case, the only change to the domain suspend
> code that I request is to tweak those silly wait loops, one which
> enforces a mandatory 100ms wait before checking whether the guest
> acked the suspend request and another 100ms wait before even
> checking if the guest suspended.  Matter of fact, if these hardcoded
> timer values can be reduced to something like a "10ms wait for first
> attempt, 40-50ms wait for subsequent attempts" then it might be
> beneficial to both remus and live migration.
> 
> NB: This is simply a bug fix and not a change in the way the control flows. 
> The code would still remain synchronous for the moment.

I wouldn't object to changing those timeouts in the remus case.  In
the non-remus case I think at this stage of the release we should
leave them unchanged.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel