[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] libxl: async version of domain suspend
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Shriram Rajagopalan writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] libxl: async version of domain suspend"): True. If that is the case, the only change to the domain suspend code that I request is to tweak those silly wait loops, one which enforces a mandatory 100ms wait before
checking whether the guest acked the suspend request and another 100ms wait before even checking if the guest suspended. Matter of fact, if these hardcoded timer values can be reduced to something like a "10ms wait for first attempt, 40-50ms wait for
subsequent attempts" then it might be beneficial to both remus and live migration. NB: This is simply a bug fix and not a change in the way the control flows. The code would still remain synchronous for the moment.
I'm not sure what George (the release manager) will think of I have kept the Remus series independent of this. Infact, the changes I suggested above are more than sufficient.
And FYI, the network buffering script is a one time invocation when Remus starts. It is not called in the context of domain suspend callbacks. The only network buffering related code in the suspend callback is invocation of libnl3 APIs
Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |