[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] arm: move GIC SGI kicking into separate function
On 12/02/2013 01:24 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: On 12/02/2013 02:16 PM, Julien Grall wrote:On 12/02/2013 11:08 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:Currently we unconditionally send SGIs to all cores on SMP bringup. PSCI will not need this, so we move this into a function and call it explicitly from the platforms that need it. This gets us get rid of the empty cpu_up() platform functions in ARM32 and the comment in there. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/arm64/smpboot.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/platform.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/platforms/exynos5.c | 11 +---------- xen/arch/arm/platforms/omap5.c | 11 +---------- xen/arch/arm/platforms/vexpress.c | 10 +--------- xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c | 15 ++++++++++----- xen/include/asm-arm/smp.h | 2 ++ 7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)[..]diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platform.c b/xen/arch/arm/platform.c index a7f9ee4..056d462 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/platform.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/platform.c @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int __init platform_cpu_up(int cpu) if ( platform && platform->cpu_up ) return platform->cpu_up(cpu); - return -EAGAIN; + return -ENODEV;This change seems unrelated to this patch.That is disputable. If I read the original code directly, the intention of EAGAIN was like: "There is no platform specific code, try something else." Now with PSCI and the GIC kicking already folded into this function, the answer to "no PSCI and no platform code" is simply: I don't know how to enable SMP, so there is no SMP => ENODEV. I can add a comment if this helps. Thanks for the explanation, I don't think it needs a comment. Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |