Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 22066: regressions - FAIL

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Saturday, November 23, 2013, 11:32:34 AM, you wrote:

> 2013/11/23 Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  

>  Saturday, November 23, 2013, 10:48:55 AM, you wrote:
>  
 >> 2013/11/23 Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  
 >>
>  
 >>  Saturday, November 23, 2013, 9:33:12 AM, you wrote:
 >>
  >>> On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 00:50 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
  >>>> Thursday, November 21, 2013, 6:44:35 PM, you wrote:
  >>>>
  >>>> > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 18:36 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
  >>>> >> Thursday, November 21, 2013, 5:37:57 PM, you wrote:
  >>>> >>
  >>>> >> > flight 22066 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
  >>>> >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/
  >>>> >>
  >>>> >> > Regressions :-(
  >>>> >>
  >>>> >> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
  >>>> >> > including tests which could not be run:
  >>>> >> >  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install    fail 
REGR. vs. 20054
  >>>> >>
  >>>> >> Wasn't this supposed to be fixed by Anthony Perards fix for Xen ?
  >>>>
  >>>> > Yes, but that needs to pass regression testing on the xen-unstable
  >>>> > branch before the qemu branch will be tested against it. xen-unstable 
is
  >>>> > currently not going through for unrelated reasons but I expect it will
  >>>> > unwedge tonight.
  >>>>
  >>>> > Ian.
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> Hi Ian / Stefano,
  >>>>
  >>>> Is the tree and branch being tested here published somewhere ?
 >>
  >>> All of the details are in each test pass/failure report. Follow the URL
  >>> and click on one of the column headers.
  >>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/
 >>  =>>
  >>> 
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/build-amd64/info.html
 >>  =>>
  >>>              tree_qemuu
  >>> git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
 >>
  >>>> A commit of mine is in there, but i can't find it where i would expected 
in:
 >>
  >>> Where is "there"?
 >>
 >>  If i pull that tree i can't find patches from Wei Liu and me, from  more 
 >> than a month ago fixing build errors when enabling debug in qemu:
 >>  http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/174
>  
>  Hmm it seems i managed to not copy and pasted correctly .. need my first 
> coffee badly.
>  
>  http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/174409
>  

 >>
 >>  Perhaps i misinterpreted my name being in the list of who "touched the 
 >> revision under test" and is it merely a tested-by or something like that.
 >>  How ever then the question would be, why aren't these patches upstreamed 
 >> yet ?
 >>  (which seems to support my earlier cry out that the Qemu dependency of Xen 
 >> seems to be a bit neglected at the moment, i let that discussion
 >>  go for the time being, see how it goes ...)
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
 >> The qemu patch must be based on master of upstream
 >> http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
 >>
 >> and posted on qemu-devel mailing list, the previous push of upstream qemu 
 >> patches from xen were made by Stefano Stabellini, so I think is good add to 
 >> cc Stefano Stabellini, Anthony Perard (as qemu maintainers) and qemu-devel 
 >> on all qemu patches.
>   
>  Stefano as xen qemu maintainer was CC'ed on both patches, qemu-devel was 
> not, that's indeed a omission.
>  
>  It had a "looks good" reply from Stefano the day after ...




> I not found it on qemu-devel, probably was not posted to it now.



> I also not found new version of patch by Wei Liu, I saw on post:
>  

>> Sander, do you mind if I take the first half of your patch, combine it
>> with my change to the above trunk to make a new patch? I find it more
>> convenient to do it that way since your patch hasn't gone in. Of course
>> I will keep your SoB. What do you think?

> Sure, no problem !

> --
> Sander

>> Wei.



> Added Wei Lui on cc.


http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-11/msg00732.html

says Stefano acked and would take it ...


>  
>  

>  
 >> Now qemu is on freeze for 1.7 but if the patches are fixes and good may be 
 >> accepted.
>  
 >>
 >> When you'll resend them you could add also me as cc, so I will help test 
 >> them, unfortunately seems that the testing of xen with qemu upstream is 
 >> still too little :(
 >>
 >>  
 >>
>  
 >>
  >>>>
  >>>> git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
  >>>>
  >>>> (and also not in: git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
  >>>> nor git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git)
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> But it is mentioned in the "People who touched revisions under test" ...
 >>
  >>> The 1.6 merge was big -- are you sure you looked far enough back?
 >>
  >>> Ian.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>  _______________________________________________
 >>  Xen-devel mailing list
 >>  Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 >>  http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
 >>
>  
>  
>  



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel