Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/12] xenctx: Add stack addr to call trace.

[Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/07/13 11:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 10:06 -0500, Don Slutz wrote:
>
> > > > > What is "stack address" is it the base of the function's stack frame
> > > > > perhaps? Or maybe the top? Or maybe the framepointer?
> > > > It is the address of the stack "word".
> > > I'm afraid I am non the wiser.
> > >
> > > Ian.
> > Does just:
> >
> >     ffffffff803ddf90: ffffffff80048d19 0000000000200800 .......... .....
> > vs
> >     ffffffff803ddf90:  [<ffffffff80048d19>] cpu_idle+0x95
> >
> > help?  The start of the line is the same.
> So it is the address of the word on the stack which contains the return
> address for the function call?
Yes.
    -Don Slutz
> Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel