Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/12] xenctx: Add stack addr to call trace.

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 09:34 -0500, Don Slutz wrote:
> On 11/07/13 07:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 15:08 -0500, Don Slutz wrote:
> > > From: Don Slutz <Don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Can you give an example of the output please.
> Here it is (With all patches active):
>           cs: 0010 @ 0000000000000000
>                    /ffffffff(a9b)

Is the ugly wrapping real or email whitespace damage?

>           ss: 0018 @ 0000000000000000
>                    /ffffffff(c93)
>           ds: 0018 @ 0000000000000000
>                    /ffffffff(c93)
>           es: 0018 @ 0000000000000000
>                    /ffffffff(c93)
>           fs: 0000 @ 0000000000000000
>                    /ffffffff(c00)
>           gs: 0000 @ ffffffff803ac000\0000000000000000 boot_cpu_pda\
>                    /ffffffff(c00)
[...]
> 
> > What is "stack address" is it the base of the function's stack frame
> > perhaps? Or maybe the top? Or maybe the framepointer?

> It is the address of the stack "word".

I'm afraid I am non the wiser.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel