[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] question on libxl ao [and 1 more messages]
>>>Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bamvor Jian Zhang writes ("[PATCH 0/2] question on libxl ao"): >> there are four choices for using ao_how in libvirt. >> (a), ao without callback and set libxl_sigchld_owner_mainloop >> (b), ao without callback and set libxl_sigchld_owner_libxl_always >> (c), ao with callback and set libxl_sigchld_owner_mainloop >> (d), ao with callback and set libxl_sigchld_owner_libxl_always >> >> i got some trouble when i try (b) and (c). >> i still not decided which one is better choice for implement in >> libvirt. it would be easier if i could try above four choice. > > I'm not sure I follow. I think the right answer for libvirt is > probably aos specifying callback, and libxl_sigchld_owner_mainloop. > I'm assuming that libvirt has something for handling children > already. But I haven't looked. If it doesn't then > libxl_sigchld_owner_always would probably be best. AFAICS, no child handle in libvirt. i will try your patches. thanks. bamvor > > Bamvor Jian Zhang writes ("[PATCH 1/2] expose child fd in order to handle > child exit in libvirt"): >> libvirt could handle fd and timeout event through >> libxl_osevent_hooks. either of these will not inform the child >> exit if libvirt set the libxl_sigchld_owner_libxl_always. > > I don't exactly follow, but I think you have found a bug. > > If libvirt specifies libxl_sigchld_owner_libxl_always then libxl will > install a SIGCHLD handler and to the self-pipe trick. The self-pipe > fd should be registered with the fd event machinery in the normal way. > However, this doesn't actually appear to happen. Instead the > beforepoll/afterpoll functions handle that fd ad-hoc. The result is > that, probably, nothing will notice the selfpipe becoming writable. > > I will see about writing a patch to fix this. > >> add a function for returning the sigchld_selfpipe in order to >> handle the child exit in libvirt. >> meanwhile, there is only one pipe in ctx, it seems that it is >> not worth to add this to libxl_osevent_hooks. > > This approach is not right, though. There is no need to add > additional interfaces to libxl. The bug just needs to be fixed. > > Thanks, > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |