Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 04/12] libxl: create a local xenstore libxl and device-model dir for guests

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH v1 04/12] libxl: create a local xenstore 
libxl and device-model dir for guests"):
> On 10/10/13 13:37, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> --- a/docs/misc/xenstore-paths.markdown
...
> >> +#### ~/libxl/$DOMID/qdisk-backend-pid [w]
> > 
> > Should both of the have BACKEND as a tag too?
> > 
> > And perhaps some tag to indicate that normal guest functions shouldn't
> > use this, similar perhaps to INTERNAL?
> 
> Ack, this is inside the "Domain Controlled Paths" section, do you think
> it would be best to place it on the "Backend Device Paths" section? Or
> maybe create a new "Backend Device Paths" inside of "Domain Controlled
> Paths".

I think perhaps a new section for "Paths private to the toolstack" or
something ?

I don't think classifying it under "backend device paths" is really
helpful - those are much more public, being used both by the backend
and the corresponding frontend.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel