Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 21288: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 30.10.13 at 01:30, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 21288 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/21288/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  8 guest-saverestore   fail REGR. vs. 
> 21268
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 
> 21268
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3  7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 21268
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64  7 windows-install         fail REGR. vs. 
> 21268
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64  7 windows-install          fail REGR. vs. 
> 21268
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  7 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 21268

All but the first one are due to the guests triple faulting while
booting. While - unless otherwise confirmed - I'd like to wait for
bisector results here, the prime suspect appears to be c9efe34c
("VMX: Eliminate cr3 store/load vmexit when UG enabled") - any
thoughts? Did you perhaps not test this on a system without UG
support?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel