Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0 PATCH 3/3] PVH dom0: construct_dom0 changes

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/10/13 14:02, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 01:30 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
>> These issues sprang up with your patches,  not with the ones that
>> Mukesh posted ? Which did get tested for regression and passed with
>> flying colours? That means there is a working baseline. Would that help?
>> Mukesh do you have any ideas what might be amiss?
>
> The issues with the code motion patch are almost certainly mine.  Andy
> Cooper ran one of Mukesh's versions through one of the XenRT tests
> (probably a nightly) and it came up fine.  I just need to go through
> and figure out what I messed up.

I ran Mukesh's v10 series through a XenServer BST, which confirmed no
glaring function regressions in PV and HVM domains.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel