Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT] Coverity Access Policy

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 23.09.13 at 16:26, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 15:14 +0100 on 23 Sep (1379949292), Ian Campbell wrote:
>> I was undecided about requiring unanimity (i.e no objections from a
>> maintainer) rather than just consensus. Any thoughts on that? A (well
>> reasoned) objection should carry a fair bit of weight under these
>> circumstances I think.
> 
> I think the standard rules are fine.  A well-reasoned objection will
> presumably bring out some `-1' votes from other maintainers.

I think so too.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel