Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/8] xen/arm: Implement ioremap.

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/10/2013 04:14 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 16:03 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 09/10/2013 03:18 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Common code uses this, it expects an uncached mapping.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  xen/arch/arm/mm.c |    5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
>>> index 69c157a..4521c8d 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
>>> @@ -694,6 +694,11 @@ void *ioremap_attr(paddr_t pa, size_t len, unsigned 
>>> int attributes)
>>>      return (__vmap(&pfn, nr, 1, 1, attributes) + offs);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +void *ioremap(paddr_t pa, size_t len)
>>> +{
>>> +    return ioremap_attr(pa, len, PAGE_HYPERVISOR_NOCACHE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> Can you inline ioremap in the header (asm-arm/mm.h)?
> 
> It's prototyped in xen/include/xen/vmap.h so I don't think so, at least
> not without introducing subtle header inclusion order traps.
> 
> It's unlikely to be performance critical so I don't think there is a
> need to refactor the definition into arch code.

Right, so:

Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>

>>>  static int create_xen_table(lpae_t *entry)
>>>  {
>>>      void *p;
>>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel