[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V11 15/18] kvm : Paravirtual ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor
- To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 16:27:12 +0530
- Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drjones@xxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, agraf@xxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, habanero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ouyang@xxxxxxxxxxx, avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chegu_vinod@xxxxxx, mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srivatsa.vaddagiri@xxxxxxxxx, attilio.rao@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:51:29 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 08/02/2013 03:24 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:25:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Ingo,
Do you have any concerns reg this series? please let me know if this
looks good now to you.
I'm inclined to NAK it for excessive quotation - who knows how many people
left the discussion in disgust? Was it done to drive away as many
reviewers as possible?
Ingo, Peter,
Sorry for the confusion caused because of nesting. I should have trimmed
it as Peter also pointed in other thread.
will ensure that is future mails.
Anyway, see my other reply, the measurement results seem hard to interpret
and inconclusive at the moment.
As Gleb already pointed, patch1-17 as a whole giving good performance
improvement. It was only the patch 18, Gleb had concerns.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
