[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V11 15/18] kvm : Paravirtual ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor
- To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:54:06 +0300
- Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, drjones@xxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, agraf@xxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, habanero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ouyang@xxxxxxxxxxx, mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx, avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chegu_vinod@xxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srivatsa.vaddagiri@xxxxxxxxx, attilio.rao@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:55:39 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:25:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ingo,
> >
> > Do you have any concerns reg this series? please let me know if this
> > looks good now to you.
>
> I'm inclined to NAK it for excessive quotation - who knows how many people
> left the discussion in disgust? Was it done to drive away as many
> reviewers as possible?
>
> Anyway, see my other reply, the measurement results seem hard to interpret
> and inconclusive at the moment.
>
That result was only for patch 18 of the series, not pvspinlock in
general.
--
Gleb.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
