[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:28:55 +0100
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim \(Xen.org\)" <tim@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 May 2013 10:33:09 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Wed, 1 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > BTW, "any higher priority" -- higher than what? Higher than the
> > > EVTCHN_CALLBACK IRQ priority or the current IAR/PMR value for the GICC?
> > 
> > Higher than the current IAR.
> 
> Good, can you mention that?

OK

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libxl: do not assume Dom0 backend while listing disks and nics
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: avoid allocating variable size array on stack
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next 1/2] xen-netback: remove redundent parameter in netbk_count_requests
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.