Re: [Xen-devel] blktap, qdisk, xl cd-eject, and xencommons

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:56:35AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
[...]
> 
> Well we didn't have that before 4.3, and it didn't seem to be a major 
                                  4.2 maybe?
> problem; I think people just knew to make sure blktap got modprobed 
> themselves.  So I wouldn't personally consider this a blocker -- but I'm 
> still open to other ideas.
> 
> In any case, it would certainly be *better* if we can have libxl attempt 
> a modprobe, so if we can get it in before the release, I think that 
> would be a good thing.
> 

So now the libxl infrastructure is no longer a blocker, good. Then how
can we justify it if we need it to go in at this stage? We're
approaching RC1 next week, what is the suitable policy for this
infrastructure?


Wei.

>   -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel