Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] docs/traces Acked patches.

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:48:33PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.03.13 at 16:37, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 25/03/13 15:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>> On 25.03.13 at 15:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>> Please commit these patches. I can also put these on a git tree
> >>> (if you could create on for me on xenbits.org that is it) for a git pull.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The trace patches have been Acked-by George.
> >> You know what - I didn't apply them precisely because the ack
> >> came through only for patches 3 and 4. I just checked the
> >> xen-devel archives again, and that's the state of affairs right
> >> now too. Possibly the ack was sent to you without Cc-ing
> >> xen-devel, but that doesn't allow me to apply them.
> > 
> > Is that because I had already Ack-ed an earlier version of the same 
> > patches, as noted right above Konrad's S-o-B line?
> 
> I must have overlooked that, partly because I expect Acked-by
> to be below Signed-off-by (only Reported-by goes ahead of it in
> my opinion, to reflect work/event flow).

Oh, that would be a different workflow than with Linux, where
Acked-by has to be above the SOB.

The SOB of the last person posting it has to be at the bottom - as that
identifies who was the last person touching / sending from a git
tree.

> 
> > I'm not 100% sure the normal protocol, but Konrad has been around the 
> > block a few times; I would think that if Konrad put my Ack-by on 
> > something, then that should have the presumption of validity -- 
> > particularly if he cc'd me (which he did) and I didn't nack it.

Right - it was done in two waves. The first two you Acked. Then a
couple of days later I sent the other two - you Acked them too.

And bundled up nicely I sent them out today.

> 
> I see now that he Cc-ed you on the post from the 18th, but I
> specifically noted that he didn't Cc you on the resubmission
> today. Which together with me not having noticed the earlier
> ack made things look inconsistent/incomplete.

Ah
> 
> Anyway - going to apply those now.

Thank you!
> 
> Jan
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel