Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] docs/traces Acked patches.

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 25.03.13 at 16:37, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25/03/13 15:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 25.03.13 at 15:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>> Please commit these patches. I can also put these on a git tree
>>> (if you could create on for me on xenbits.org that is it) for a git pull.
>>>
>>>
>>> The trace patches have been Acked-by George.
>> You know what - I didn't apply them precisely because the ack
>> came through only for patches 3 and 4. I just checked the
>> xen-devel archives again, and that's the state of affairs right
>> now too. Possibly the ack was sent to you without Cc-ing
>> xen-devel, but that doesn't allow me to apply them.
> 
> Is that because I had already Ack-ed an earlier version of the same 
> patches, as noted right above Konrad's S-o-B line?

I must have overlooked that, partly because I expect Acked-by
to be below Signed-off-by (only Reported-by goes ahead of it in
my opinion, to reflect work/event flow).

> I'm not 100% sure the normal protocol, but Konrad has been around the 
> block a few times; I would think that if Konrad put my Ack-by on 
> something, then that should have the presumption of validity -- 
> particularly if he cc'd me (which he did) and I didn't nack it.

I see now that he Cc-ed you on the post from the 18th, but I
specifically noted that he didn't Cc you on the resubmission
today. Which together with me not having noticed the earlier
ack made things look inconsistent/incomplete.

Anyway - going to apply those now.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel