Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17112: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17112: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> On 07.03.13 at 01:37, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 17112 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17112/ 
> > version targeted for testing:
> >  xen                  d9fb28ae6d41c8201482948660e52889481830dd
> > baseline version:
> >  xen                  ba9ef879973f9bee4b72c8f1d3ef816bc58e5fdc
> 
> I don't follow why this, being run against an over 2 days old commit,
> completed only now, or - if it got started later - why it didn't also pick
> up 9ada002 (which hopefully will fix most of the above).

The testing system has had a bit of a backlog.  Partly this is caused
by repeated retests of xen-4.2-testing, itself, but also the switch to
git reset the scheduler data in a way that resulted in it queueing a
lot of jobs onto a single host.

> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > People who touched revisions under test:
> >   George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >   Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Also, it looks like ever since the switch to git this list only picks up
> people involved with the top most commit, and doesn't include the
> committer.

I have fixed this but the change is in osstest staging ...

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel