Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17112: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 07.03.13 at 01:37, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 17112 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17112/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2    5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> 16772
>  test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 16772
>  test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3  7 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 16772
>  test-amd64-i386-win           7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 16772
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 
> 16772
>  test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3  7 windows-install          fail REGR. vs. 
> 16772
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 
> 16772
> ...
> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  d9fb28ae6d41c8201482948660e52889481830dd
> baseline version:
>  xen                  ba9ef879973f9bee4b72c8f1d3ef816bc58e5fdc

I don't follow why this, being run against an over 2 days old commit,
completed only now, or - if it got started later - why it didn't also pick
up 9ada002 (which hopefully will fix most of the above).

> ------------------------------------------------------------
> People who touched revisions under test:
>   George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
> ------------------------------------------------------------

Also, it looks like ever since the switch to git this list only picks up
people involved with the top most commit, and doesn't include the
committer.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel