Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 16774: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 16774: 
regressions - FAIL"):
> There was a batch of 6 patches committed about a week ago.
> Which of them is causing the problem I don't know (and don't
> care much, as I believe the patch set is of use only if all of them
> are there).
> 
> As to reverting or fixing - I wanted to give Stefano and Anthony
> a chance to fix if that's doable, and fall back to reverting
> otherwise. But of course that first of all requires that at least
> one of them responds...

I think we should time out now.  The correct approach is that if
problems are not fixed quickly, the problematic changesets should be
reverted.

> And then I wouldn't want to be messing with the qemu tree when
> Stefano is in charge of it, so I would still expect him to do the
> revert if needed.

We can revert the change to QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION in xen.git,
effectively rewinding to a previous revision, without disturbing
Stefano's work.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel