|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] AMD IOMMU: also spot missing IO-APIC entries in IVRS table
>>> On 06.02.13 at 15:41, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2/6/2013 8:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>
>> + /* Each IO-APIC must have been mentioned in the table. */
>> + for ( apic = 0; !error&& apic< nr_ioapics; ++apic )
>> + {
>> + if ( !nr_ioapic_entries[apic] ||
>> + ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].pin_setup )
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "IVHD Error: no information for IO-APIC %#x\n",
>> + IO_APIC_ID(apic));
>> + if ( amd_iommu_perdev_intremap )
>> + error = -ENXIO;
>> + else
>> + {
>> + ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].pin_setup = xzalloc_array(
>> + unsigned long, BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_ioapic_entries[apic]));
>> + if ( !ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].pin_setup )
>> + {
>> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "IVHD Error: Out of memory\n");
>> + error = -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> return error;
>> }
>>
>
> Don't we end up with ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].bdf/seg being
> uninitialized? They are usually set in parse_ivhd_device_special(), at
> the same time pin_setup is allocated, but with IVRS broken in this way
> we'll never get there, will we?
Correct. .bdf/.seg being uninitialized is no much of a problem
when using global intremap tables though. And certainly not on
a system with just a single IOMMU (as was the case on the
crashing system). Do you see alternatives? Disable the IOMMU
always, even if not using global remap tables? That could be
seen as a regression, as at least global remap tables worked fine
so far on such systems.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |