Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] AMD IOMMU: also spot missing IO-APIC entries in IVRS table

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/6/2013 8:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:

> +    /* Each IO-APIC must have been mentioned in the table. */
> +    for ( apic = 0; !error&&  apic<  nr_ioapics; ++apic )
> +    {
> +        if ( !nr_ioapic_entries[apic] ||
> +             ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].pin_setup )
> +            continue;
> +
> +        printk(XENLOG_ERR "IVHD Error: no information for IO-APIC %#x\n",
> +               IO_APIC_ID(apic));
> +        if ( amd_iommu_perdev_intremap )
> +            error = -ENXIO;
> +        else
> +        {
> +            ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].pin_setup = xzalloc_array(
> +                unsigned long, BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_ioapic_entries[apic]));
> +            if ( !ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].pin_setup )
> +            {
> +                printk(XENLOG_ERR "IVHD Error: Out of memory\n");
> +                error = -ENOMEM;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>       return error;
>   }
Don't we end up with ioapic_sbdf[IO_APIC_ID(apic)].bdf/seg being 
uninitialized? They are usually set in parse_ivhd_device_special(), at 
the same time pin_setup is allocated, but with IVRS broken in this way 
we'll never get there, will we?
-boris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel