Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 15401: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 15401: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 11:44 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > including tests which could not be run:
> > >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 15179
> > 
> > With some handholding, I managed to get the bisector to work on this.
> > It found that the original "good" version is unreliable: it built Xen
> > 5af4f2ab06f3 and in two recent tests on the same host, of the same
> > build, it failed once and passed once.
> 
> Hrm, did it make any progress over the w/e.

It stops when it finds that the failure, or the previous pass, isn't
reproducible.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel