Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 15401: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

xen.org writes ("[xen-unstable test] 15401: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 15401 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15401/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 15179

With some handholding, I managed to get the bisector to work on this.
It found that the original "good" version is unreliable: it built Xen
5af4f2ab06f3 and in two recent tests on the same host, of the same
build, it failed once and passed once.

Under the circumstances it's not clear that the current staging is any
worse than non-staging.  I think we should push the revision reported
in this test (which was otherwise OK according to the tester) to
non-staging, with a manual "hg push".

> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  d1bf3b21f783

I'm not sure how to do this with hg and have to go catch a train so I
don't have time to look it up, but presumably there's some rune of the
form "hg push -r d1bf3b21f783 ssh://xenbits/xen-unstable.hg"

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel