[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Add support for netconsole driver used on bridge device with VIF attached
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 11:23:32 am Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 18:00 +0000, yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On 01/21/2013 07:28 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 17:17 +0000, Yuval Shaia wrote: > > >> When starting a VM which has virtual interface attached to the same > > >> bridge (i.e vif = [type=netfront,bridge=xenbr0'] in vm.cfg) which is > > >> used for netconsole the > > >> following message appears (after about 60 seconds) and VM creation > > >> operation fails. > > >> Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts > > >> not working. > > > > > > I'm not sure how this can relate netconsole since this happens before > > > the guest even runs, doesn't it? > > > > Running the same scenario without netconsole runs smoothly. > > But why? I can't make sense of your scenario and therefore cannot > explain why this patch would make any difference. Perhaps your patch is > just papering over some other issue? > > > >> As i see it, netconsole driver requires ndo_poll_controller from the > > >> device's controlling driver (function __netpoll_setup in > > >> net/core/netpoll.c), a thing that is not supported currently in > > >> xen_netback driver which is the driver that runs on dom0 and serve > > >> VM's virtual interface. > > > > > > Which domain is using netconsole? Is it dom0 or domU? What parameters > > > do you give it? > > > > dom0. > > parameters: netconsole=1111@src-ip/xenbr0,2002@dst-ip/dst-mac > > You give these parameters to dom0 so that dom0's own logs are sent to > some other host? > > Are dst-ip and dst-mac a domain on the same host or are they some offbox > logging service? Sorry, my mistake, i should have attach network setup at first. Anyway, here is my setup: ---------- ---------- | Host A |--bond0--->| | Host B | |--------| |--xenbr0 | | | VM A1 |--vif1.0-->| | | | ---------- | ---------- | | V V --------------------------------------------- | LAN | --------------------------------------------- I'm using netconsole to capture logs from Host-A and send them to Host-B. Host-A and Host-B are separate hosts (running XEN) which are connected to the same LAN. src-ip is Host-A address. dst-ip/mac is Host-B address. > > I can see why the *bridge* device might need an ndo_poll_controller hook > in this setup but I can't see any reason why the netback device would > need one. > Please note that without netback driver netconsole runs fine, i.e before trying to create VM which attached to the bridge. > > > I assume it is the domU but if that's the case I don't see why a > > > netback rather than netfront patch would be required. > > > > > > Or is dom0 doing netconsole where the log receiver is a domU? > > > > Log received at dom0 as output of xm cr vm.cfg command. > > netconsole is used on dom0 to monitor its log > > Are you now saying that logging goes from domU to dom0? Which is it? netback comes to play as soon as i'm attaching virtual interface to a bridge and since this bridge is under netconsole monitoring the function is triggered. Up to that point there is no issue getting logs in Host-B so i assume the problem is not with the bridge driver. > > In this scenario there is really no reason I can see that netback would > need an ndo_poll_controller hook -- that would be needed in the domU in > the netfront driver. > > Please can you explain the exact code path which results in this new > hook being called. > init_netconsole() in netconsole.c -> alloc_param_target() -> netpoll_setup() in netpoll.c -> __netpoll_setup() which check if ndo_poll_controller() operation is supported. > BTW looking at the patch as it is any use of this hook should be wrapped > in CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER. > > Ian. > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |