Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/blkback: Check for insane amounts of request on the ring.

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:18:59PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.01.13 at 16:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> >>> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:07:46AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 25.01.13 at 19:43, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> > @@ -764,6 +768,9 @@ __do_block_io_op(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
> >> >          rp = blk_rings->common.sring->req_prod;
> >> >          rmb(); /* Ensure we see queued requests up to 'rp'. */
> >> >  
> >> > +        if (RING_REQUEST_PROD_OVERFLOW(&blk_rings->common, rp, rc))
> >> > +                return -EACCES;
> >> 
> >> Actually I wonder whether we need the new macro at all: It seems
> >> to me that using RING_REQUEST_CONS_OVERFLOW(&blk_rings->common, rp)
> >> here would achieve the same effect.
> > 
> > But it would not. The RING_REQUEST_CONS_OVERFLOW only check that the
> > non-shared ring entries (rsp_prod and rsp_prod_pvt) are less than
> > the size of the ring (32). In other words - they check whether we want
> > to process more requests as we still have a back-log of responses to
> > deal with.
> 
> So did you not notice that here 'rp' (i.e. req_prod) is being passed,
> not 'rc'?

Oh, no I did not :-(

That ought to do the trick too.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel