[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen, credit2: Avoid extra c2t calcuation in csched_runtime
On 24/01/13 15:45, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.01.13 at 16:24, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:--- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c @@ -1505,31 +1505,42 @@ csched_dom_destroy(const struct schedule static s_time_t csched_runtime(const struct scheduler *ops, int cpu, struct csched_vcpu *snext) { - s_time_t time = CSCHED_MAX_TIMER; + s_time_t rt_credit, time; /* Proposed runtime measured in credits */Does rt_credit really need to be s_time_t rather than int? I suppose not... struct csched_runqueue_data *rqd = RQD(ops, cpu); struct list_head *runq = &rqd->runq;if ( is_idle_vcpu(snext->vcpu) )return CSCHED_MAX_TIMER;- /* Basic time */- time = c2t(rqd, snext->credit, snext); + /* General algorithm: + * 1) Run until snext's credit will be 0 + * 2) But if someone is waiting, run until snext's credit is equal + * to his + * 3) But never run longer than MAX_TIMER or shorter than MIN_TIMER. + */- /* Next guy on runqueue */+ /* 1) Basic time: Run until credit is 0. */ + rt_credit = snext->credit; + + /* 2) If there's someone waiting whose credit is positive,... who's ...? Nope. :-) "Who's" is short for "who is". "Whose" is a pronoun which links back to "someone waiting". (I suppose "whose" is the person version of "which", which I used in both the previous sentence and this one.) + * run until your credit ~= his */ if ( ! list_empty(runq) ) { - struct csched_vcpu *svc = __runq_elem(runq->next); - s_time_t ntime; + struct csched_vcpu *swait = __runq_elem(runq->next);- if ( ! is_idle_vcpu(svc->vcpu) )+ if ( ! is_idle_vcpu(swait->vcpu) + && swait->credit > 0 ) { - ntime = c2t(rqd, snext->credit - svc->credit, snext); - - if ( time > ntime ) - time = ntime; + rt_credit = snext->credit - swait->credit; } }+ /* FIXME: See if we can eliminate this conversion if we know time+ * will be outside (MIN,MAX). Probably requires pre-calculating + * credit values of MIN,MAX per vcpu, since each vcpu burns credit + * at a different rate. */The obvious situation is when rt_credit <= 0, which you could deal with right away. That shouldn't be possible:1. csched_runtime() should only be called on someone about to be scheduled (from csched_schedule()). 2. The credit of such an snext should always be higher than anyone else on the queue (or they would be scheduled instead). 3. If someone is about to be scheduled with snext->credit <= 0, it will trigger reset_credt(), which will make everyone's credit positive. 4. 3 guarantees that snext->credit will be positive 5. 2 guatantees that (snext->credit - swait->credit) will be positive 6 So rt_credit should never be <= 0. I can add an assert to this effect if you like. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |