Re: [Xen-devel] kernel 3.7+ cpufreq regression on AMD system running as dom0

[Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:03:43PM +0000, Stefan Bader wrote:
> From 9870926d4a847e36c0f61921762fd50f1c92f75d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Check MSR valid bit before using P-state frequencies
> 
> To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on
> some AMD systems f594065faf4f9067c2283a34619fc0714e79a98d
>   "ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures"
> introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading
> from AMD specific MSRs.
> 
> This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that
> quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass through MSR
> reads to the HW. Instead the guest gets a 0 in return.
> And this seems to cause a failure to initialize the ondemand
> governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states appear to run
> at the same frequency).
> 
> While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow
> a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work
> around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out
> that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit
> and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered
> a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen.
> 
> [v2] Reword description text and use helper for bit index.
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.7..
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c 
> b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> index 836bfe0..caa042e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> @@ -340,6 +340,17 @@ static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct
> acpi_processor_px *px, int i)
>       if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10)
>           || boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
>               rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi);
> +             /*
> +              * MSR C001_0064+:
> +              * Bit 63: PstateEn. Read-write. 1=The P-state specified by
> +              * this MSR is valid. 0=The P-state specified by this MSR is
> +              * not valid. The purpose of this register is to indicate if
> +              * the rest of the P-state information in the register is
> +              * valid after a reset; it controls no hardware.
> +              */

Maybe this comment is a but too long and it contains that idiotic
processor manual speak :-). It should've contained only the first
sentence: "PstateEn. If set, the P-state is valid."

But maybe Rafael could correct it while committing, no reason to resend
for that only.

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>


> +             if (!(hi & BIT(31)))
> +                     return;
> +
>               fid = lo & 0x3f;
>               did = (lo >> 6) & 7;
>               if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10)
> -- 
> 1.8.0

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel