Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3 development update, and stock-taking

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 17/01/13 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> And to be clear - unless someone manages to eliminate the 
> "conceptually wrong" argument above, I'm intending to veto any changes 
> that violate the model set by the specification. Jan 
Just for my information, could you describe what you think is 
"conceptually wrong" about leaving boot services for dom0?  I would 
consider Xen+dom0 to be two halves of the "Xen system", and so leaving 
boot services on until dom0 gets a chance to fix up quirks doesn't seem 
to me any different than leaving it on when booting to Linux directly.  
If the spec doesn't explicitly say "hypervisor", then I would think 
"kernel" in a Xen system would conceptually include both Xen and dom0.
 -George

(And sorry for responding 3 times to the same mail!)


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel