[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] oopsable race in xen-gntdev [PATCH 0/3]
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 05:57:10PM -0500, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > On 12/21/2012 03:18 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:12:11PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > >> 1) find_vma() is *not* safe without ->mmap_sem and its result may > >> very well be freed just as it's returned to caller. IOW, > >> gntdev_ioctl_get_offset_for_vaddr() is racy and may end up with > >> dereferencing freed memory. > > I agree, this one should be fixed by taking mmap_sem in > gntdev_ioctl_get_offset_for_vaddr. Iterating the grant_map list here > will not work under HVM, where map->vma is not filled in. > > >> 2) gntdev_vma_close() is putting NULL into map->vma with only > >> ->mmap_sem held by caller. Things like > >> if (!map->vma) > >> continue; > >> if (map->vma->vm_start >= end) > >> continue; > >> if (map->vma->vm_end <= start) > >> done with just priv->lock held are racy. > >> > >> I'm not familiar with the code, but it looks like we need to > >> protect gntdev_vma_close() guts with the same spinlock and probably > >> hold ->mmap_sem shared around the "find_vma()+get to map->{index,count}" > >> in the ioctl. Or replace the logics in ioctl with search through the > >> list of grant_map under the same spinlock... > >> > >> Comments? > > Although I don't think the mmu notifier is ever called without mmap_sem > on this particular device file (we map only with VM_DONTCOPY and other > paths like truncate generally aren't triggered), it's probably best not > to rely on that behavior, so adding the spinlock in gntdev_vma_close > seems to be the best solution. > > > Hey Al, > > > > Thank you for your analysis. Are you OK with the patches or have comments about them? Thanks. > > > > CC-ing Daniel, David and Stefano. I recall we had some priv->lock movement > > in the past and there is also interaction with another piece of code - > > the balloon code so we better be circumspect of not blowing up. > > > > Al, it is around holidays and folks are mostly gone - so this will take > > a bit of time to get sorted out. > > While I was digging in this code, I found a related bug in > mn_invl_range_start: if gntdev_ioctl_unmap_grant_ref is called on > a range before unmapping it, the entry is removed from priv->maps and > the later call to mn_invl_range_start won't find it to do the unmapping. > This could be fixed by using find_vma, but I don't think there's a safe > way to do that from inside the mmu notifier, so instead I created a list > of these unlinked but still mapped pages. > > The third patch is a fix to an unrelated bug that I found while testing > the fixes in the other two patches. > > [PATCH 1/3] xen/gntdev: fix unsafe vma access > [PATCH 2/3] xen/gntdev: correctly unmap unlinked maps in mmu > [PATCH 3/3] xen/gntdev: remove erronous use of copy_to_user _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |