Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:26323 & Dom0:3.7.1

[Mats Petersson <mats.petersson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/01/13 17:10, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2013, at 3:57 AM, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > > On 10.01.13 at 08:51, "Ren, Yongjie" <yongjie.ren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > New issue(1)
> > > ==============
> > > 1. sometimes live migration failed and reported call trace in dom0
> > >   http://bugzilla.xen.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1841
> > For the failed allocation, the only obvious candidate appears to be
> >
> >         err_array = kcalloc(m.num, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > which quite obviously can be of (almost) arbitrary size because
> >
> >         nr_pages = m.num;
> >         if ((m.num <= 0) || (nr_pages > (LONG_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> >
> > really only checks for completely insane values.
> >
> > This got introduced by Andres' "xen/privcmd: add PRIVCMD_MMAPBATCH_V2
> > ioctl" and is becoming worse with Mukesh's recent "xen: privcmd:
> > support autotranslated physmap guests", which added another
> > similar (twice as large) allocation in alloc_empty_pages().
> Perhaps the err_array in this case, since alloc_empty_pages only happens for 
> auto translated dom0s.
>
> Not familiar wether libxl changes (or is even capable of changing) parameters 
> of the migration code. But right now in libxc, mapping is done in 
> MAX_BATCH_SIZE batches, which are of size 1024. So we are talking about 1024 
> ints, which is *one* page.
>
> So is really the kernel incapable of allocating one measly page?
>
> This leads me to think that it might be gather_array, but that one would 
> allocate a grand total of two pages.
>
> In any case, both functions allocate arbitrary number of pages, and that is the 
> fundamental problem.
>
> What is the approach in the forward ported kernel wrt to gather_array?
>
> The cleanest alternative I can think of is to refactor the the body of 
> mmap_batch to allocate one page for each array, and iteratively call 
> traverse_pages recycling the local arrays and increasing the pointers in the 
> source user space arrays.
>
> Having said that, that would allocate two pages (always), and the code right now 
> allocates max three (for libxc driven migrations). So maybe the problem is 
> elsewhere….
>
> Thanks,
> Andres
Whilst this may not add much to the discussion, where I have been 
working on the improved privcmd.c, I have been using 3.7.0rc5 and 3.8.0. 
Both of these seem to work fine for migration using the libxc interface 
(since I've been using the Xenserver build, the migration is not done 
through libxl).
I have not had a single failure to allocate pages in the migration, - I 
have a script that loops around migrating the guest to the same host as 
quickly as it can and I have used guests up to 64GB (and left that 
running overnight - it takes about 3 minutes, so a night gives several 
hundred iterations.
So I'm wondering what is different between my setup and this one...

--
Mats
> > I'd like to note that the forward ported kernels don't appear to
> > have a similar issue, as they never allocates more than a page at
> > a time. Was that code consulted at all when that addition was
> > done?
> >
> > Jan
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel