[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reserve next two XENMEM_ op numbers for future/out-of-tree use
>>> On 07.12.12 at 16:15, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 28/11/2012 22:03, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> xen: reserve next two XENMEM_ op numbers for future/out-of-tree use >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > There was some discussion on whether these numbers should just have > XENMEM_reserved_oracle_{1,2} definitions, or similar. Or even just reserved > by a header comment. Does anyone have any strong opinions? I think if it's known what they're for, calling them by their names should be quite fine. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |