[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reserve next two XENMEM_ op numbers for future/out-of-tree use
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:15:00PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 28/11/2012 22:03, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > xen: reserve next two XENMEM_ op numbers for future/out-of-tree use > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > There was some discussion on whether these numbers should just have > XENMEM_reserved_oracle_{1,2} definitions, or similar. Or even just reserved > by a header comment. Does anyone have any strong opinions? I would just go with the claim/get_unclaimed. The 'Oracle' part is already in the comment section. > > -- Keir > > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/memory.h b/xen/include/public/memory.h > > index f1ddbc0..3ee2902 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/public/memory.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/memory.h > > @@ -421,6 +421,12 @@ struct xen_mem_sharing_op { > > typedef struct xen_mem_sharing_op xen_mem_sharing_op_t; > > DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_sharing_op_t); > > > > +/* > > + * Reserve ops for future/out-of-tree "claim" patches (Oracle) > > + */ > > +#define XENMEM_claim_pages 24 > > +#define XENMEM_get_unclaimed_pages 25 > > + > > #endif /* defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) */ > > > > #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_MEMORY_H__ */ > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |