[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC PATCH] xen: vmx: Use an INT 2 call to process real NMI's instead of self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler
>>> On 13.11.12 at 15:43, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The fact that there was a loop and not just a delay in the NMI handling
> suggests that VMENTER does indeed re-enable NMIs (or at least
> NMI-exiting) but I couldn't find that in the manual. In any case, I
> think the int $2 version is correcter than the direct call as it also
> disables normal interrupts.
You're not commenting on the stack aspect and previous approach
at all: Assuming your self_nmi() approach at least worked
somewhere, that somewhere would be the place where the "int $2"
approach would break. In other words - are you confident that
NMI is _always_ masked when we get there (and hence your
earlier approach _never_ worked)?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|