Re: [Xen-devel] libxl drivers for libvirt?

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] libxl drivers for libvirt?"):
> That sounds like a good plan.  For 4.1, xend is still the default 
> toolstack, and libxl is a "tech preview"; for 4.2, xl is the default 
> toolstack, and (if I understand correctly) we're officially going to be 
> supporting the libxl interface in a backwards-compatible way from here 
> forward.

Yes.

> It seems to me that if you have trouble supporting both libxl 4.2 and 
> libxl 4.1, that it might be better just to drop 4.1 support and focus on 
> 4.2.  Ian Campbell / Jackson: Thoughts?

Yes, I agree.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel