Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 21/21] xen: more substitutions

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 05.10.12 at 12:38, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -4195,6 +4197,7 @@ static int handle_iomem_range(unsigned long s, unsigned 
> long e, void *p)
>      if ( s > ctxt->s )
>      {
>          e820entry_t ent;
> +        XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(e820entry_t) buffer_t;

I'm not really in favor fo the _t suffix chosen here and below, as
that's generally used for typedef-s. Could this be replaced with
e.g. _p, _h, or _hp?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel