Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: fix Intel case of resume handling on boot CPU

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>]

On 27/09/2012 16:59, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Checking the stored version doesn't tell us anything about the need to
> apply the update (during resume, what is stored doesn't necessarily
> match what is loaded).
> 
> Note that the check can be removed altogether because once switched to
> use what was read from the CPU (uci->cpu_sig.rev, as used in the
> subsequent pr_debug()), it would become redundant with the checks that
> lead to microcode_update_match() returning the indication that an
> update should be applied.
> 
> Note further that this was not an issue on APs since they start with
> uci->mc.mc_intel being NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
> @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(const
>      }
>      return 0;
>   find:
> -    if ( uci->mc.mc_intel && uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev >= mc_header->rev )
> -        return 0;
>      pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with"
>               " version %#x (current=%#x)\n",
>               cpu, mc_header->rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel