[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2 S3 regression?
- To: Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:32:13 +0100
- Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:32:44 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
- Thread-index: Ac2aYWMsrJeQLzhxPEyh9mja2+y0WA==
- Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2 S3 regression?
I would like to see it myself and Ack it. Although I think I can guess what it does and I will be happy with it if I’m right. :)
-- Keir
On 24/09/2012 15:16, "Ben Guthro" <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Would you prefer a separate [PATCH] email for this fix, or will you apply it as-is?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 24.09.12 at 15:56, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ...; the interesting ones are
>> - at the end of xen/arch/x86/acpu/cpu_idle.c:acpi_dead_idle()
>> - xen/arch/x86/domain.c:default_dead_idle()
>
>
> Thanks! This fixes the issue on this machine!
Hooray!
> Is this a reasonable long-term solution - or are there reasons not to
> call wbinvd() here?
That's a perfectly valid adjustment (see my earlier reply where
I originally suggested it and explained why it may be necessary).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
