[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 19/22] arch/x86: check remote MMIO remap permissions
On 09/13/2012 04:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 12.09.12 at 17:59, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> When a domain is mapping pages from a different pg_owner domain, the >> iomem_access checks are currently only applied to the pg_owner domain, >> potentially allowing the current domain to bypass its more restrictive >> iomem_access policy using another domain that it has access to. > > Are you sure about this? I ask because ... > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> @@ -754,6 +754,18 @@ get_page_from_l1e( >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> >> + if ( pg_owner != curr->domain && >> + !iomem_access_permitted(curr->domain, mfn, mfn) ) >> + { >> + if ( mfn != (PADDR_MASK >> PAGE_SHIFT) ) /* INVALID_MFN? */ >> + { >> + MEM_LOG("Domain %u attempted to map I/O space %08lx in >> domain %u", >> + curr->domain->domain_id, mfn, pg_owner->domain_id); >> + return -EPERM; >> + } >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + > > ... the place you insert this is after non-RAM pages got filtered > out already, so you're applying an IOMEM permission check to a > RAM page. > > Jan > >> if ( !(l1f & _PAGE_RW) || >> !rangeset_contains_singleton(mmio_ro_ranges, mfn) ) >> return 0; If that's true, then the check a few lines above is also applying IOMEM checks to RAM pages. I can see non-privileged attempts being filtered above, but successful mappings will continue to the check I added. -- Daniel De Graaf National Security Agency _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |