Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2 S3 regression?

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:28:37AM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
> How is it that it works with an older hypervisor, then?
> 
> Konrad - is the v7 code functionally different than the v10 code, or
> is it more  stylistic changes?

It is that v3.4 (and up) already has the restore_MSI hypervisor call:

commit 8605c6844fb9bdf55471bb87c3ac62d44eb34e04
Author: Tang Liang <liang.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Dec 8 17:36:39 2011 +0800

    xen: Utilize the restore_msi_irqs hook.
    
    to make a hypercall to restore the vectors in the MSI/MSI-X
    configuration space.
    
    Signed-off-by: Tang Liang <liang.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>

The only part that is left out of mainline is the part where the hypercall
is done properly. That is what the acpi/s3.v10 does.. but after talking to
Len he pointed out a different way of doing this.

> 
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >>>> On 04.09.12 at 14:49, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I forgot to address your dom0 kernel concern -
> >>
> >> All of these tests have been run with Konrad Wilk's acpi-s3.vX branches.
> >>
> >> The later kernels took more recent branches, while the 3.2.yy kernels
> >> used an older (but still functional) branch (acpi-s3.v7)
> >
> > This and the log you provided suggest that your kernel is lacking
> > the MSI restore code altogether (or it is not getting called as
> > intended). With that, there's pretty little point in continuing
> > the investigation on the hypervisor side.
> >
> > Jan
> >

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel