[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] xen: replace XEN_GUEST_HANDLE with XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM when appropriate
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.08.12 at 14:56, Stefano Stabellini > >>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Perhaps we have a different understanding of embedded fields: > >> I'm thinking of structure field having XEN_GUEST_HANDLE() type. > >> An example would be struct mmuext_op's vcpumask field, which > >> is being passed to vcpumask_to_pcpumask(). This must remain to > >> be possible (and not just in x86-specific code, where it's mere luck > >> that both are really identical). > > > > Thanks for the concrete example; glancing through the common code I > > didn't find any examples like this. > > As I wrote in the follow up email, guest_handle_cast is just what we > > need: > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > > index 4d72700..70ffa58 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > > @@ -3198,7 +3198,9 @@ int do_mmuext_op( > > { > > cpumask_t pmask; > > > > - if ( unlikely(vcpumask_to_pcpumask(d, op.arg2.vcpumask, > > &pmask)) ) > > + if ( unlikely(vcpumask_to_pcpumask(d, > > + guest_handle_cast(op.arg2.vcpumask, > > const_void), > > No, the conversion should explicitly _not_ require specification > of the type, i.e. this should not be a true cast. Type safety > (checked by the compiler) can only be achieved if no intermediate > cast is involved. guest_handle_cast is implemented as: #define guest_handle_cast(hnd, type) ({ \ type *_x = (hnd).p; \ (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(type)) { _x }; \ }) as you can see there is actually no explicit cast involved. If you specify the wrong type the compiler would fail at: type *_x = (hnd).p; I think that having to specify the type as parameter is acceptable if it makes up for simpler code over all. The alternative would be something like the following: diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c index 4d72700..e6685c7 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c @@ -3197,8 +3197,11 @@ int do_mmuext_op( case MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI: { cpumask_t pmask; + XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) param; - if ( unlikely(vcpumask_to_pcpumask(d, op.arg2.vcpumask, &pmask)) ) + set_xen_guest_handle(param, op.arg2.vcpumask.p); + + if ( unlikely(vcpumask_to_pcpumask(d, param, &pmask)) ) { okay = 0; break; but I think it makes the code worse. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |